Historians voted at their annual meeting to condemn Horowitz's attack on academic independence.
Apparently, there was a debate about whether this should extend to all forms of speech codes on campus. The council decided not to extend their condemnation, arguing that the current threat was the "academic bill of rights," not speech codes, which have been blocked by courts in the past.
I am sympathetic to intellectual freedoms of all types, so I can understand the argument that this kind of condemnation should include all codes that want to restrict independent discussion on campus. However, we know that is not what the Horowitzers of the world want.
Inside Higher Ed :: More Criticism of 'Academic Bill of Rights'
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment