We heard about the big changes that LERT is planning for gen ed at our last department meeting.
Is everyone ready for a turf-war?
And I thought there weren't any good campus issues to blog about lately!
Commentary on the Current State of the University of Wisconsin Oshkosh
We heard about the big changes that LERT is planning for gen ed at our last department meeting.
Is everyone ready for a turf-war?
And I thought there weren't any good campus issues to blog about lately!
This is an interesting story that I have been following: Marquette offered and then rescinded an offer of deanship, seemingly because she is gay.
It seems shameful to me and a sign of the turmoil within Catholic higher education. It is, however, nice to be following a scandal on someone else's campus!
You can read about it in the Journal-Sentinel; the latest plan promises increase in graduates by 30%.
Do you think it stands any chance of getting real support in Madison? I doubt it!
The reaction against laptops in the classroom has hit the Washington Post. It lists professors banning laptops at George Washington U, American, William and Mary, and Virginia.
I tend to agree--too often it is clear that students are simply surfing the web or doing something else. The bigger question is whether typing is as good for memory as writing.
I find writing notes is the best way to remember what I have read or heard. I don't think typing does as well.
The feeding frenzy over the biologist at University of Alabama -- Huntsville has been as exaggerated as we could have expected.
She even made the front page of the New York Times today.
It is a horribly tragic event, but much of the focus is driven by the fact that she was a professor. It is not an uncommon occurrence when something like this happens. Should we be flattered that her profession matters so much in a case like this?
Maybe the Northwestern can refer to us all as Amy Bishops instead of Jeffrey Dahmers!
A commenter wrote this:
How about the necessity of defining what we try to do in each class as part of the ongoing LERT reform? Since we are restricted to only three choices, I was very disappointed to have to say that I DON'T teach writing in my class, and that I DON'T teach critical analysis of concepts, etc., etc. The process seems ridiculously reductionist.
These are good questions--we looked at the descriptions as a department last month. People were disturbed by the language that told us all that we do not teach writing in our classes. It looked like the English department convinced LERT that only they could teach writing!
The New York Times Style section has a story about the changing nature of gender relations on campus. In it, the author describes how partying has changed because of the decreasing percentage of men on campus.
The NY Times seems to run these kinds of breathless stories about shocking changes on a fairly regular basis. The author (Seems like a man, but I can't be sure since the name is Alex) seems to be imagining how great it must be to hook up without dating.
Welcome back everyone. I have been slow at posting as of late. I haven't found a good campus issue to sink my teeth into.
Instead, I have a complaint out of Canada about decline grammar skills among freshman. This is not a surprising phenomenon, but it is always fun to see it in the news.
Perhaps this semester, we will see the beginnings of the move toward unionization. That should be a nice way to get the blog moving again. Anything else?
Barnes and Noble getting into the textbook rental business. Read the story here.
The rental fee will be 42.5% of the new cost. This seems worse than the used book market, but if there is a new edition, I suppose it might work.
How is our own local rental business doing? Is it still here?
The left-wing journal Democracy Now calls for more accountability in higher education. The author argues that IT can provide the information needed to improve college performance.
The article claims that NSSE and the CLA are going to be saviors for higher ed. I guess the assessment gurus got to him. Oh, wait, he is a think tank director in DC. . . I'm sure they have.
We know all problems can be solved if only we have a rubrik!
Cash-strapped communities talk of "student tax." Several cities in Pennsylvania look at taxing student tuition as a way to raise additional revenue. It appears as yet unclear if it is actually legal.
I hesitate to post it, because I can imagine some of our local officials who dislike the university might find this to be a good idea. . .
The New York Times hosts an interesting forum today about the future of higher education, on the heels of the massive tuition increases in the California Universities.
The panel seems to be almost unanimous that it doesn't matter. They seem to all think that tuition was too low in CA anyway. . .
The Chronicle of Higher Education posts this discussion.
It seem particularly relevant for us, with our highest enrollment ever and a failure rate of first year students approaching 20%.
With the growing burden of college costs, is there any surprise that students are struggling? How many students are forced down the college path without ever confronting the reality of debt and failure?
I found this interesting article in Dissent. Jeffery Williams argues that the nature of student debt binds students for years afterward. He argues that the debt reinforces class discrimination, and counteracts the notion that the U.S. can be a meritocracy.
Although Dissent is very left-wing venue, I think that Williams raises some very interesting points.